magic1host.com/blog

With proper testing, education and methodology you too can be guaranteed results from your advertising.

The first viable return on investment from your advertising is an inquiry for your product or service. It may be an email, a phone call or a visit to a store.

In any case this is just an inquiry for the goods or service. This is real evidence your advertising is working and generating a return on investment.

But, in either case, it is just an Inquiry for the goods, of one sort or another. It is the first practical evidence that the money spent is earning something tangible in return.

When she talks to a retailer it there are 2 to 3 times as many chances of substitution. The salesperson may try to sell the customer a higher commission item or the one that is in stock. Whereas if the customer orders online or by phone there is less of a chance of substitution.

But, when he does inquire verbally from a Retailer, there are twice or three times as many chances of substitution, of Don’t-keep-it Or Here’s-something-better. As there would have been if that same Consumer had written direct for it by Mail.

If the ad fails to convince the consumers with a “Reason why” and conviction it could direct him to a retail store where they are switched to a competing brand, the retailer is overstocked in, or that the salesman prefers. In which case we would be helping our competitor’s bottom line. Half the money spent to keep the brand on people’s minds results in the substitution of non-advertised goods for the advertised through General advertising. The ad must therefore give them a better Reason to buy your goods than he is likely to get from the Salesperson for the competitions goods that Salesman will want to substitute. It must give him this reason in such lucid thought-form that he can comprehend without effort, so impressively that he will believe our reasoning Claims. It must accomplish this in spite of his natural distrust of all Advertisement statements.

The ad must give them a better reason to buy our product or service than he is likely to get from the Salesperson for the competitions goods that Salesman will want to substitute. It must give him this reason in such undeniable form that he can comprehend without effort, so absolutely that he will believe our reasoning Claims. It must accomplish this in spite of his natural distrust of all Ads statements. Therefore not more than 1/4 of those who, out of mere curiosity, buy the first package, through “branding” ever buy the 2nd or 3rd consecutive package of the same product. Because they do not buy on Conviction In the Meantime, it usually takes about all the profit in the first purchase of any “branding campaign” to pay the cost of introducing it to the Consumer through Advertising.

In contrast to general publicity “Reason-Why Advertising” or Salesmanship-on-Paper, ROI is predictable. Consumers need only be convinced 1 time, through “Reason why advertising” or “Salesmanship- on-paper,” we thus convince him, and more than fortifying him against substitution.

With reason why advertising they begin using the article with an advance knowledge of, and belief in, its good points, his appreciation becomes permanent if the goods merit it. He therefore makes a second, third, and further consecutive purchases of the article as a result of having once read a single convincing “Reason-Why” advertisement about it.

The consumer will become a regular buyer of the product because he first read or heard about it in a reason why advertisement. Repeat customers are much more profitable than new ones.

He therefore makes a second, third, and further consecutive purchases of the article as a result of having once read a single convincing Reason Why advertisement about it. This is where large and cumulative profits must come to the General Advertiser-on the second, third and continued purchases by Readers of the first advertisement that reached their Convictions.

The difference in Results from Space in which this direct selling force of “Reason-Why” has been used, and in results from similar space filled with “General Publicity,” is often more than 60 per cent. Conclusive tests on Copy have clearly proved this, and preceding article cites a vivid example of it from actual experience